[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070326000149.GE19691@lazybastard.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:01:52 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22 take 3] UBI: Unsorted Block Images
On Mon, 26 March 2007 00:46:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 00:55 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > although, since you can flip bits to 1 without requireing an erase you
> > [ vice versa. you can flip bits to 0 without erasing. ]
>
> And on NAND flash you can't just do it in multiple cycles one bit at a
> time. The 'tally' trick isn't viable there.
You can on NAND. ECC is done in software. And for a data structure as
simple as the 'tally', foregoing ECC is not a huge problem - most
bitflips are easily detected and the remaining only cause off-by-a-few
on the erase count.
On NOR with transparent (hardware) ECC you can't.
Jörn
--
Homo Sapiens is a goal, not a description.
-- unknown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists