[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703260811.18236.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:11:18 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: accurate user accounting
Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> Ok this one is heavily tested. Please try it when you find the time.
It's better, but still skewed. Try two chew.c's; they account 80% each.
> ---
> Currently we only do cpu accounting to userspace based on what is
> actually happening precisely on each tick. The accuracy of that
> accounting gets progressively worse the lower HZ is. As we already keep
> accounting of nanosecond resolution we can accurately track user cpu,
> nice cpu and idle cpu if we move the accounting to update_cpu_clock with
> a nanosecond cpu_usage_stat entry.
That's great and much needed, but this is still probed; so what's wrong with
doing it in-lined?
> This increases overhead slightly but
> avoids the problem of tick aliasing errors making accounting unreliable.
Higher scheduling accuracy may actually offset any overhead incurred, so it's
well worth it; and if it's in-lined it should mean even less overhead.
> + /* Sanity check. It should never go backwards or ruin accounting
> */ + if (unlikely(now < p->last_ran))
> + goto out_set;
If sched_clock() goes backwards, why not fix it, instead of hacking around
it?
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists