[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460789E0.1000600@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:52:48 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
CC: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
jamagallon@....com, tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New format Intel microcode...
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> that is the whole point. The slash was never meant to be used. It was
> designed to take a filename or a pattern that will be later matched by
> userspace. However some developers are now trying to abuse this since
> the simple firmware helper script matches this directly to a filename
> (and directory in this case) on the disk.
>
> Putting a slash in the request_firmware() call now enforces a
> subdirectory
I don't see how this follows from the former. Userspace is free to
translate the kernel string into anything it wants, even a simple
replacement of / with _. So I don't see how this "enforces" a
subdirectory. Firmware gets a namespace basically, and a / is a
logical namespace separator.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists