lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:09:49 +0200
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Larry Finger <larry.finger@...inger.net>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	Monakhov Dmitriy <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
	Eric Rannaud <eric.rannaud@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:06:18 -0800,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Would I be right in guessing that this was all triggered by
> uevent-improve-error-checking-and-handling.patch?

Looks like it, since it passed the uevent failures to the upper layer.

> If so, do you think I should labour on with
> uevent-improve-error-checking-and-handling.patch plus your fix, or should I
> drop the lot?  (I'm inclined toward the latter, but I'm still not
> sure which patch(es) need to be dropped).

This depends on what semantics uevent returning an error code should
have. The firmware code was using it to suppress uevents, but
uevent_suppress is a better idea now. So if we want uevent returning !=
0 to imply "something really bad happened", all uevent functions have
to be audited and those that work like firmware_uevent have to be
converted to uevent_suppress. This would be cleaner, but I'm not sure
it's worth the work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists