[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070327000210.GZ2986@holomorphy.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:02:10 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 23:09 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> Dirty page accounting/limiting doesn't work for nonlinear mappings, so
>>> for non-ram backed filesystems emulate with linear mappings. This
>>> retains ABI compatibility with previous kernels at minimal code cost.
>>> All known users of nonlinear mappings actually use tmpfs, so this
>>> shouldn't have any negative effect.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:51:27AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> They do? I thought the whole point of nonlinear mappings was for
> mapping files bigger than the address space (eg. databases). Is Oracle
> instead using this to map >3G files on a tmpfs??
It's used for > 3GB files on tmpfs and also ramfs, sometimes
substantially larger than 3GB.
It's not used for the database proper. It's used for the buffer pool,
which is the in-core destination and source of direct I/O, the on-disk
source and destination of the I/O being the database.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists