[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1HW6eb-0003WX-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:03:41 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch resend v4] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
> > > There is surely no need to duplicate all that.
> >
> > Yeah, we could teach generic_writepages() to conditionally not submit
> > for io just test/clear pte dirtyness.
> >
> > Maybe that would be somewhat cleaner, dunno.
> >
> > Then there are the ram backed filesystems, which don't have dirty
> > accounting and radix trees, and for which this pte walking is still
> > needed to provide semantics consistent with normal filesystems.
>
> hm.
>
> I don't know how important all this is, really - we've had this bug for
> ever and presumably we've already trained everyone to work around it.
>
> What usage scenarios are people actually hurting from? Is there anything
> interesting in the mysterious Novell Bugzilla #206431?
That's just a failing LTP testcase, not quite real life ;)
But Peter Staubach says a RH custumer has files written thorugh mmap,
which are not being backed up.
> Perhaps we can get away with doing something half-assed which covers most
> requirements...
OK. At least I can split the patch into two half asses.
The big question is tmpfs and friends. Those won't get any timestamp
update without additional page table walking.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists