linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: Fix bogus softlockup warning with sysrq-t

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <460902CF.1030202@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:41:03 -0400
From:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	clalance@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, davej@...hat.com,
	Thilo.Cestonaro.external@...itsu-siemens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix bogus softlockup warning with sysrq-t


> I have another pair of softlockup patches in which I try to address:
>
>     * ignoring time stolen by hypervisors
>     * threads going to sleep tickless for long periods of time
>
>   

I'm looking at the code now.  Your solution is definately better :)

> I could easy add a "global disable" function, which would allow long
> sysrq messages, and it would help Thilo with his long flash update freezes.
>
>   

I think that's a good idea -- I'll propose an add on patch to fix the 
sysrq-t case ...

P.

>     J
>   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/