[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0703271005460.21437@d.namei>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:12:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Sami Farin <safari-kernel@...ari.iki.fi>
cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Subject: Re: oprofile / selinux / security_port_sid
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:40:23 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 13:06 +0300, Sami Farin wrote:
> > > is there room for improvement in security_port_sid() ?
> >
> > Yes, lots of room. Also, it won't get called per-packet if you enable
> > secmark (echo 0 > /selinux/compat_net or boot with selinux_compat_net=0
> > or build with SECURITY_SELINUX_ENABLE_SECMARK_DEFAULT), although that
> > may require updating your policy.
>
> Hmm, test was done with
> CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK=y
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_ENABLE_SECMARK_DEFAULT=y
> and /selinux/compat_net = 0
Even with this setting, you'll be hitting security_port_sid() via
connect(2) and bind(2). We need to fix it.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists