| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200703272329.13779.ak@suse.de> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:29:13 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> To: discuss@...-64.org Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [discuss] 2.6.21-rc5-mm1: i386/x86_64 register_die_notifier() change On Tuesday 27 March 2007 23:26, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:57:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: > >... > > +move-die-notifier-handling-to-common-code.patch > >... > > Misc > >... > > Is the removal of the vmalloc_sync_all() call in register_die_notifier() > on i386 and x86_64 both intentional and correct? It's wrong. The die notifier is used by NMIs and that needs vmalloc_sync_all() Thanks for catching that. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists