[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4608B0CA.1040005@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:51:06 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
Subject: ATA ACPI (was Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There's various fixes here, ranging from some architecture updates (ia64,
> ARM, MIPS, SH, Sparc64) to KVM, networking and network drivers.
>
> And random one-liners.
>
> But probably more important, and likely much more visible to most people
> is the fixes for the fallout from the hrtimers and no-HZ changes, and some
> of the ACPI regressions.
>
> Those timer changes ended up much more painful than anybody wished for,
> but big thanks to Thomas Gleixner for being on it like a weasel on a dead
> rat, and the regression list has kept shrinking.
>
> So if you have reported a regression in the 2.6.21-rc series, please check
> 2.6.21-rc5, and update your report as appropriate (whether fixed or "still
> problems with xyzzy").
>
> Linus
[just got back from vacation, or would have sent this earlier]
FWIW, I'm still leaning towards disabling libata ACPI support by default
for 2.6.21.
Upstream has Alan's fix for the worst PATA problems, but for different
reasons, I think PATA ACPI and SATA ACPI support in libata does not feel
quite ready for prime time in 2.6.21.
Scream now, or hold your peace until 2.6.22... :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists