linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0703280951h47fbb597wea2f37a6f1412644@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:51:56 +0200
From:	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To:	"Jiri Kosina" <jikos@...os.cz>
Cc:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Philippe Elie" <phil.el@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5

On 28/03/07, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: mount/7245
> > is fixed, thanks.
> > but I still get this
> > [  208.523901] =================================
> > [  208.529739] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> > [  208.534087] 2.6.21-rc5-g28defbea-dirty #131
> > [  208.538260] ---------------------------------
> > [  208.542611] inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.
> > [  208.548600] swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
>
> Perhaps something like the one below?
>

Problem seems to be fixed. Thanks!

Regards,
Michal

-- 
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group (PL)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
LTG - Linux Testers Group (EN)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/linux_testers_group_en/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/