[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460AB9E8.8070803@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:54:32 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, jgarzik@...ox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/5] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject : e1000 resume weirdness
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/26/91
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Handled-By : Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
> Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
> Status : problem is being debugged
The issue comes from a corner case and the underlying problem is that e1000
isn't stopping tx properly. We have a fix for this pending in our tree that I'll
push upstream for 2.6.22 to Jeff, but I don't think this should be a blocker and
it's probably is not a regression at all, the gap has always been present.
on a side note, this is probably fixed easily by turning the adapters
detect_tx_hung flag off in e1000_down, so if someone spots this reoccurring
somewhat regularly, please contact me so we can debug it. I myself have a system
suspend/resuming in circles for an hour now with traffic flying across without a
single hit on it....
Adrian, you probably want to drop this issue from your list.
Cheers,
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists