[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d120d5000703281200wd914f51s18437a6a8e4107f6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:00:06 -0400
From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: "Li Yu" <liyu@...ss.com.cn>, yanghong@...ss.com.cn,
linux-usb-devel <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
hongzhiyi@...ss.com.cn, "Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Li Yu" <raise.sail@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] HID bus design overview.
On 3/28/07, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> The crucial thing here is that all reports but the ones that the driver
> registered to will be processed in a standard way by the generic hid bus
> layer, and those reports that the driver registered to will be ignored by
> the layer, and passed for processing to the driver.
>
I don't think it is a good idea to register driver for specific
usages/reports. Quite often you want to adjust processing of a report
for a specific device. What if there are 2 devices that need such
quirks? How will you do hotplug and module loading? Emit new uevent
for every report? Also, what about users and Kconfig? "Driver for
usage 0x000012345. Say Y if your hardware does not wotk correctly with
defautl handler for this usage and require special processing"???
Just register based on VID/PID and provide standard
hid_default_input_event() to drivers so they would call it for reports
they don't need to do special processing on.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists