linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200703282122.22869.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:22:22 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation

On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:18, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 00:13, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >   
> >> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
> >> duplicates of the same logic.  This patch combines them by
> >> implementing them in terms of the more general
> >> smp_call_function_mask().
> >>     
> >
> > I think I got those already.
> >   
> 
> OK.  Do you have smp_ops and machine_ops?

Not yet. Can you resend the current set?

> There's a doc update patch too:

Can you send that separately after i sync out please?

Thanks

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/