[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703281238.57811.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:38:55 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Maxim <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 9:38 am, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> It's a *device*, dammit. It should save and resume like one (probably as a
> system device). The "set_mode()" etc stuff is at a completely different
> (higher) conceptual level.
Agreed, except about "probably as a system device".
Last I checked, there was no good reason to use sysdev suspend()/resume()
rather than platform_device suspend_late()/early_resume(). Which more
or less means no good reason to use sysdev in new code...
Also, making HPET use the legacy mode seems like a step backwards.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists