[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703281359.29009.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:59:26 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Maxim <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 1:19 pm, Maxim wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:38:55 David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > Also, making HPET use the legacy mode seems like a step backwards.
> It is not 'legacy' mode,
> It is a legacy replacement mode.
Typo, sorry.
> It this mode HPET takes over IRQ0 and IRQ 8 and provides this way
> replacement for PIT and RTC periodic function
It's that RTC periodic thing that bothers me, I don't mind about
the PIT. Remember that IRQ8 is also used for other RTC functions.
Now, if there were a way to tell rtc-cmos that HPET is active,
and arrange some kind of handshake ... that would be different.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists