[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703281435330.14017@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i386: Remove page sized slabs for pgds and pmds
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> I'd also appreciate if it were mentioned who actually wrote this, given
> that the patch posted was what I sent you verbatim (and actually
> requested you not post for good reasons, some centering around pageattr.c).
Ughhh. Sorry I had this in there in early editions but removed the
paragraph later.
> The salient point from the above, which was conveniently omitted, was
> "it's all dominated by PTE caching." However, even this needs some
> qualification having to do with the VSZ of the parent process in fork().
> For very small processes, such as cannot be constructed with glibc due
> to its massive bloat and cannot be constructed with the standard process
> address space layouts due to stacks being too distant from text and
> heap, PTE's actually don't substantially outnumber PMD's et al, so
> there is more to this story.
No that was described in the patch. Quote:
"i386 only provides support for caching constructed pgd and pmds. These
are comparatively rare to ptes so it is no surprise that the current
approach has only minimal effect. ...."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists