[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070328224717.GK10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:47:17 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jeremy@...p.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i386: Remove page sized slabs for pgds and pmds
* Zachary Amsden (zach@...are.com) wrote:
> William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >>clone_pgd_range() for consistency? and it seems we lost a
> >>paravirt_alloc_pd_clone() in there somewhere.
> >>
> >
> >Yes, another reason why it shouldn't have been posted as-is. It was not
> >intended to for anything more than comparative benchmarking on systems
> >without graphics running on the bare metal as opposed to Xen/etc. guests.
> >
>
> So clone_pgd_range is mostly useless now. Originally, I intended it to
> take the part of paravirt_alloc_pd_clone. We should probably merge the
> two into just one function, unless someone thinks clone_pgd_range is
> actually useful for something.
No, I was going to suggest just that. It was orginially introduced as
the place holder for that IIRC.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists