[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070328232558.28719.96929.stgit@americanbeauty.home.lan>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:26:11 +0200
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...nel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH][2.6.21] uml: fix unreasonably long udelay
Currently we have a confused udelay implementation.
* __const_udelay does not accept usecs but xloops in i386 and x86_64
* our implementation requires usecs as arg
* it gets a xloops count when called by asm/arch/delay.h
Bugs related to this (extremely long shutdown times) where reported by some
x86_64 users, especially using Device Mapper.
To hit this bug, a compile-time constant time parameter must be passed - that's
why UML seems to work most times.
Fix this with a simple udelay implementation.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
---
arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c | 11 -----------
arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c | 11 -----------
include/asm-um/delay.h | 17 ++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c b/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c
index 2c11b97..d623e07 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c
+++ b/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c
@@ -27,14 +27,3 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usecs)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__udelay);
-
-void __const_udelay(unsigned long usecs)
-{
- int i, n;
-
- n = (loops_per_jiffy * HZ * usecs) / MILLION;
- for(i=0;i<n;i++)
- cpu_relax();
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__const_udelay);
diff --git a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c
index 137f444..dee5be6 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c
+++ b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c
@@ -28,14 +28,3 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usecs)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__udelay);
-
-void __const_udelay(unsigned long usecs)
-{
- unsigned long i, n;
-
- n = (loops_per_jiffy * HZ * usecs) / MILLION;
- for(i=0;i<n;i++)
- cpu_relax();
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__const_udelay);
diff --git a/include/asm-um/delay.h b/include/asm-um/delay.h
index 0985bda..c71e32b 100644
--- a/include/asm-um/delay.h
+++ b/include/asm-um/delay.h
@@ -1,9 +1,20 @@
#ifndef __UM_DELAY_H
#define __UM_DELAY_H
-#include "asm/arch/delay.h"
-#include "asm/archparam.h"
-
#define MILLION 1000000
+/* Undefined on purpose */
+extern void __bad_udelay(void);
+
+extern void __udelay(unsigned long usecs);
+extern void __delay(unsigned long loops);
+
+#define udelay(n) ((__builtin_constant_p(n) && (n) > 20000) ? \
+ __bad_udelay() : __udelay(n))
+
+/* It appears that ndelay is not used at all for UML, and has never been
+ * implemented. */
+extern void __unimplemented_ndelay(void);
+#define ndelay(n) __unimplemented_ndelay()
+
#endif
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists