linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Virtual methods for devices and generalized GPIO support using it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <460B0399.5080904@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:08:57 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org,
	Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Virtual methods for devices and generalized GPIO support
 using it

Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> 
>      By this criteria I happened to choose macros syntax. But it's still
> merely a syntax, and I don't pledge for it. If there's more movement
> towards using explicit low-level forms like 1) or 2) instead of
> introducing new syntactic pattern, then macro syntax can be considered
> to have fulfilled its introductory role and can be dropped.
> 

"Movement towards?!"  That's been a fundamental part of Linux design 
since the very beginning.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/