[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7B0DEC32-4413-46CB-BB4D-DC6A1674F2EC@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:51:15 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
davej@...emonkey.org.uk, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for deferrable timers (respun-Mar28)
On Mar 29, 2007, at 07:41:12, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> ondemand is the biggest offender and the patch below reduces the
>> number of interrupts by 50% or more (depending on HZ) on different
>> test systems here.
>
> Cool!
>
>> Yes. There are quite a few other timers inside kernel that can be
>> migrated. I will use timer_stats and track others and send in the
>> patches soon.
>
> Longer term it might make sense to even expose this as a option to
> user space. Maybe as a new timer in setitimer()? This might safe
> power with "wiggling desktop applets" too.
Might also be useful to add an extra option to "top" to reduce the
polling frequency if the system is otherwise idle. A fixed 30-sec
timer and a deferrable 1-sec timer or somesuch?
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists