lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070329012955.GD17334@kvack.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:29:55 -0400
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@....com>
Cc:	"Linux-Kernel, " <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inlining can be _very_bad...

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> It looks like is updating the stack on each iteration...This is -march=opteron
> code, the -march=pentium4 is similar. Same behaviour with gcc3 and gcc4.
> 
> tst.c and Makefile attached.
> 
> Nice, isn't it ? Please, probe where is my fault...

Yes, gcc sucks in its handling of large return values, news at 11.  I have 
several outstanding bugs on cases where gcc could keep things in registers 
but doesn't.

That said, it tends to do much better on plain integer code, as that is 
what it gets tuned for.  Do NOT propagate the blanket myth that inlining is 
a bad thing.  It is very useful for small functions where the overhead 
associated with call/ret sequences and register clobbers overshadows the 
work being done.  The call/ret updates alone can make a big difference when 
there are lots of other (more useful) memory transactions to complete.  Take 
a look at things like the notifier hooks for an example of something that 
does far too little work per function call and should really be inlined.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <zyntrop@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ