[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460B47BE.5080502@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:59:42 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: linux@...izon.com
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, miklos@...redi.hu
Subject: Re: [patch resend v4] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
linux@...izon.com wrote:
>>But if you didn't notice until now, then the current implementation
>>must be pretty reasonable for you use as well.
>
>
> Oh, I definitely noticed. As soon as I tried to port my application
> to 2.6, it broke - as evidenced by my complaints last year. The
> current solution is simple - since it's running on dedicated boxes,
> leave them on 2.4.
Well I didn't know that was a change in behaviour vs 2.4 (or maybe I
did and forgot). That was probably a bit silly, unless there was a
good reason for it.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists