linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix dependency generation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:14:58 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dependency generation

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:43:17PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >But that will break UM - no??
> >See following note from fixdep:
> > * Note 2: if somebody writes HELLO_CONFIG_BOOM in a file, it will depend onto
> > * CONFIG_BOOM. This could seem a bug (not too hard to fix), but please do not
> > * fix it! Some UserModeLinux files (look at arch/um/) call CONFIG_BOOM as
> > * UML_CONFIG_BOOM, to avoid conflicts with /usr/include/linux/autoconf.h,
> > * through arch/um/include/uml-config.h; this fixdep "bug" makes sure that
> > * those files will have correct dependencies.
> 
> Hmm, didn't see this note. Then this might warrant special casing UML, but
> penalizing all code due to this seems at least odd to me.

If I understand this, I would think that special-casing UML_CONFIG_*
instead of *_CONFIG_* would be the way to go.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/