linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc5] Flush MSI-X table writes (rev 3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070330194956.GA8028@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:49:56 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc5] Flush MSI-X table writes (rev 3)

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:47:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:04:02 -0600
> ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> 
> > Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com> writes:
> > 
> > > This patch fixes a kernel bug which is triggered when using the
> > > irqbalance daemon with MSI-X hardware.
> > >
> > > Because both MSI-X interrupt messages and MSI-X table writes are posted,
> > > it's possible for them to cross while in-flight.  This results in
> > > interrupts being received long after the kernel thinks they're disabled,
> > > and in interrupts being sent to stale vectors after rebalancing.
> > >
> > > This patch performs a read flush after writes to the MSI-X table for
> > > mask and unmask operations.  Since the SMP affinity is set while
> > > the interrupt is masked, and since it's unmasked immediately after,
> > > no additional flushes are required in the various affinity setting
> > > routines.
> > >
> > > This patch has been validated with (unreleased) network hardware which
> > > uses MSI-X.
> > >
> > > Revised with input from Eric Biederman.
> > 
> > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> 
> Did we end up deciding whether this is (needed*safe) enough for 2.6.21?

I say no for now, I have seen no bug reports for any hardware that is
not in a lab for this.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/