[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070330201017.GA21944@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:10:17 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc5] Flush MSI-X table writes (rev 3)
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:49:56 -0700
> Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > > > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> > >
> > > Did we end up deciding whether this is (needed*safe) enough for 2.6.21?
> >
> > I say no for now, I have seen no bug reports for any hardware that is
> > not in a lab for this.
>
> Well. Presumably that hardware will be in the field during the lifetime of
> 2.6.21-based kernels.
>
> Perhaps we should put this into 2.6.22 then backport it to 2.6.21.x once it
> seems safe to do so. If we decide to go this way, we'll need to ask Mitch
> to remind us to do the backport at the appropriate time, else we'll surely
> forget.
Yes, that's what I just asked him to do a message ago :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists