[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070330032905.GA4384@nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:29:05 -0400
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new sysfs layout and ethernet device names
Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) said:
> > If interfaces have to change, so be it. But changing the rules for
> > using them years after it's implemented and then claiming "you didn't
> > read the instructions" is pretty lame.
>
> That documentation has been in the kernel tree for almost a full year:
It has a date on it. I'm not blind. That doesn't change the fact that
that documentation:
> Date: Thu Apr 27 14:10:12 2006 -0700
postdates the interface it's describing by at *least* two years. Which
was the point of my mail that you conveniently ignored - retroactively
deciding which parts of the interface you export to userspace shouldn't be
used falls way short of best practices.
> Anyway, yes, older code should still "just work" if you enable the
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED config option in the kernel, that is what it is
> there for.
It appears to... the point was that (as far as the code is concerned)
it's a silent break. Of course, code that expects the 'current' layout
will then break when this new change is made, unless you add
CONFIG_SYSFS_SLIGHTLY_LESS_DEPRECATED?
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists