-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" Currently we have a confused udelay implementation. * __const_udelay does not accept usecs but xloops in i386 and x86_64 * our implementation requires usecs as arg * it gets a xloops count when called by asm/arch/delay.h Bugs related to this (extremely long shutdown times) where reported by some x86_64 users, especially using Device Mapper. To hit this bug, a compile-time constant time parameter must be passed - that's why UML seems to work most times. Fix this with a simple udelay implementation. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c | 11 ----------- arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c | 11 ----------- include/asm-um/delay.h | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) --- a/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c +++ b/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c @@ -27,14 +27,3 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usecs) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__udelay); - -void __const_udelay(unsigned long usecs) -{ - int i, n; - - n = (loops_per_jiffy * HZ * usecs) / MILLION; - for(i=0;i 20000) ? \ + __bad_udelay() : __udelay(n)) + +/* It appears that ndelay is not used at all for UML, and has never been + * implemented. */ +extern void __unimplemented_ndelay(void); +#define ndelay(n) __unimplemented_ndelay() + #endif -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/