[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070330041001.GA20566@verge.net.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:10:03 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Simon Derr <simon.derr@...l.net>
Subject: [PATCH] CPUSETS: add mems to basic usage documentation
It seems that there must be at least one node in mems
and at least one CPU in cpus in order to be able to assign
tasks to a cpuset. This makes sense. And I think it would
also make sense to include a mems setting in the basic usage
section of the documentation.
I also wonder if something logged to dmsg, explaining why
a write failed, would be a good enhancement. I ended up having
rummage arround in cpuset.c in order to work out why my
configuration was failing.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/cpusets.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/cpusets.txt 2007-03-30 13:03:07.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6/Documentation/cpusets.txt 2007-03-30 13:03:19.000000000 +0900
@@ -557,6 +557,9 @@
Add some cpus:
# /bin/echo 0-7 > cpus
+Add some mems:
+# /bin/echo 0-7 > mems
+
Now attach your shell to this cpuset:
# /bin/echo $$ > tasks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists