[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17932.37976.65001.735686@notabene.brown>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:38:48 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID (non-preempt) server blocking question. (2.6.20.4)
On Thursday March 29, jpiszcz@...idpixels.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
> > running at?
> Around 44MB/s.
>
> I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
> processes to 'stay alive'?
>
> echo "Setting minimum resync speed to 200MB/s..."
> echo "This improves the resync speed from 2.1MB/s to 44MB/s"
> echo 200000 > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_speed_min
> echo 200000 > /sys/block/md1/md/sync_speed_min
> echo 200000 > /sys/block/md2/md/sync_speed_min
> echo 200000 > /sys/block/md3/md/sync_speed_min
> echo 200000 > /sys/block/md4/md/sync_speed_min
>
Yes, well....
You told it to use up to 200MB/s and the drives are only delivering
44MB/s, so they will be taking nearly all of the available bandwidth.
You shouldn't be too surprised if other things suffer.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists