linux-kernel - Re: Heads up on VFS based union mount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:39:35 +0530
From:	Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jblunck@...e.de
Subject: Re: Heads up on VFS based union mount

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:04:16PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Mar 30 2007 15:38, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >
> >In union mount approach we maintain this stacking information in the 
> >dentry structure. When a filesytem is union mounted on a mountpoint, 
> >the dentry of the mount root would hold a reference to the mountpoint 
> >dentry as an overlaid dentry and these two dentries together form a 
> >union stack. Any subsequent readdir operation on this union mounted 
> >dentry would work on the overlaid dentry also thereby providing the 
> >merged view of the two filesystems.
> 
> What about whiteouts? (I cannot remember whether Jan Blunk's paper 
> mentioned it at all.)

We do have whiteout support. And as I mentioned earlier, the underlying
filesystem needs to support the new 'whiteout' filetype. As of now it is
supported for ext2, ext3 and ramfs.

Regards,
Bharata.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/