[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3014.1175346205@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:03:25 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@...hat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] coredump: add an interface to control the core dump routine
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Yes, I agree - I don't think we presently have a way of avoiding having
> to send all of that uninteresting data down the pipe.
Have the kernel fork and exec a debug program "just in time" with the dying
process ptrace-attached in advance. That program could then use ptrace() or
whatever to do the coredump. I think Windows does something like that.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists