[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070331180806.55d572c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:08:06 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, hugh@...itas.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
oneukum@...e.de, maneesh@...ibm.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD driver-core] Lifetime problems of the current driver model
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:12:48 +0900,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hm, but as long as dk0 is registered, it can be looked up and someone
> > could get a reference on it.
>
> Yeah, exactly. That's why any getting any kobject reference backed by a
> module must be accompanied by try_module_get().
>
> int mydrv_get_dk(struct dk *dk)
> {
> rc = try_module_get(mydrv);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> kobject_get(&dk->kobj);
> return 0;
> }
This works if the caller always knows which module to grab (I was
thinking about some tree-walking code).
> Exactly, in that case, module reference count must not be zero. You and
> I are saying the same thing. Why are we running in circle?
I hope we're not, it just makes one dizzy :)
I'll think some more about it...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists