[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703310908160.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, pavel@...e.cz,
linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> While I agree in principle with the patch, I'm a bit uncomfortable. The
> sys device suspend / resume ordering is not guaranteed and relies on the
> registering order.
Well, this is why we probably should try to get away from the "system
device" issue, exactly because system devices are totally outside the
normal ordering and only have a random linear order.
If the clocksources were actually in the device tree, you'd get all the
normal guarantees about hierarchical ordering..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists