lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703301922280.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/13] signal/timer/event fds v8 - anonymous inode source
 ...



On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > Ok, it was panincing, and someone made me change it. Would you please 
> > agree?
> > The system can survive w/out, but it'll be a broken system WRT userspace.
> 
> I'd say panic.  There's no much point in limping along with an
> incorrectly-working kernel, only to have some small number of apps fail
> mysteriously later on.

Well, in this case (since it's at bootup only), I'd agree with panic(), 
but generally I disagree - it's actually much better to have a broken 
system limping along and allowing things like syslogd to write the problem 
to log-files and generally working as well as possible.

If people can do a "dmesg" and send it out as an email, we're much more 
likely to get good bug-reports.

But for early boot, and for something that can't really happen anyway, 
panic() sounds fine.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ