[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1175309657.12230.420.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:54:17 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] Convert PDA into the percpu section
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 04:35 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 31 March 2007 04:00, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Currently x86 (similar to x84-64) has a special per-cpu structure
> > called "i386_pda" which can be easily and efficiently referenced via
> > the %fs register. An ELF section is more flexible than a structure,
> > allowing any piece of code to use this area. Indeed, such a section
> > already exists: the per-cpu area.
>
> Hmm, I'm a little reluctant. This moves i386 more away from x86-64
> again. If we ever merge them it would mean more work. Do you really need it?
Well, I think the merge should go the other way in this case: this
really does simplify things.
The only thing stopping x86-64 from doing the same as i386 is the
stack-protector stuff. And that can be fixed (unfortunately requires a
gcc patch to change the %gs:40 to %gs:__gcc_stack_protector_offset and
emit a weak absolute symbol __gss_stack_protector_offset = 40).
I shall prepare a patch for that next week; I've been busy Kleening up
lguest 8)
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists