linux-kernel - Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200703310758.15339.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date:	Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:58:15 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus

Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yesterday, I piddled around with tracking interactive backlog as a way
> to detect when the load isn't really an interactive load, that's very
> simple and has potential.

You may want to consider fixing latencies per nice relative to load, as the 
biggest problem with iab are huge latency delays, which exhibit themselves 
as starvation, caused by unfair timeslice management.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/