[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <834572.46808.qm@web26713.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Xenofon Antidides <xantidides@...oo.gr>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
--- Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:36 -0700, Xenofon Antidides
> wrote:
>
> > Something different on many cpus? Sorry I was
> thinking
> > something other. I try 50% run + 50% sleep on one
> cpu
> > and mainline has big problem. Sorry for bad code I
> > copy bits to make it work. Start program first
> then
> > run bash 100% cpu (while : ; do : ; done). Try
> change
> > program forks from 1 till 3 or more mainline
> kernel
> > and bash gets 0%.
Mainline hangs with program. SD does not have problem
with program and is more responsible then mainline.
> That's mainline with the below (which I'm trying
> various ideas to improve).
Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.
Xant
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists