linux-kernel - Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1175322706.6030.20.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:31:46 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Xenofon Antidides <xantidides@...oo.gr>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus
	SD/RSDL

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote:

> Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.

Shrug.  My milage is different, but hey, it's a work in progress.  If SD
ever gets to the point that it actually delivers what it claims, I may
join you.

In the meantime, IMHO mainline is MUCH better in the general case.  If
the general case was that which the various sleep exploits do, the
history mechanism in mainline wouldn't have survived it's first day.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/