linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/16] vt-pure-colors.diff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1175500241.4614.23.camel@daplas>
Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:50:41 +0800
From:	"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@...il.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/16] vt-pure-colors.diff

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:04 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Apr 2 2007 14:49, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> >
> >Not too sure about this, the default palette is based on ANSI/ECMA
> >standards (at least for the first 8 colors). Also, this will have subtle
> >effects on the 16-color logo. Since your first patch already allows us
> >to change the palette, let's leave the default alone.
> 
> Ok.
> But to note: xterm and anything graphical (including MS Windows)
> uses the anti-pale color (255,0,0) instead of (255,170,170).

Actually, what threw me off was index 4 in default_blu, which has a
value of 0x90.  This looks weird to me, but I guess that is a typo. I
really have nothing against using 0, 0, 255 instead of 170, 170, 255 in
the intense version of the first 8.

Tony 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/