[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070402093324.GA21857@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:33:24 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>, hugh@...itas.com,
cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
oneukum@...e.de, maneesh@...ibm.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD driver-core] Lifetime problems of the current driver model
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:59:43AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Dependencies between sysfs/kobject objects are clearer now and I think
> I got the locking and referencing correct. This patch immediately
> fixes 'sysfs attr grabbing the wrong kobject and module' problem -
> sysfs and module lifetimes are unrelated now. We can drop
> half-working attr->owner.
>
> * A sysfs node no longer hold reference to its kobject. It just
> attaches itself to the kobject on creation and detaches on deletion.
>
> * For a dir node, sysfs_dirent no longer directly points to kobject.
> It points to sysfs_dir which contains pointer to kobject and a rwsem
> to protect it.
>
> * An open file doesn't hold a reference to kobject. It holds a
> reference to sysfs_dirent. kobject pointer is verified and
> show/store are performed with rwsem read-locked. Deletion
> disconnects the sysfs from its kobject while the rwsem is
> write-locked. This mechanism replaces buffer orphaning and kobject
> validation during open.
Ah, very nice.
> * attr ops is determined on sysfs node creation not on open. This is
> a step toward making kobject opaque in sysfs.
>
> * bin files are handled similarly but mmap makes the open file hold
> reference to the kobject till it's closed. Any better ideas?
This is probably needed, and might be acceptable, and I think we can
live with it as there is only a very small number of sysfs files that
fall into this category.
> * symlink is reimplemented in terms of sysfs_dirents instead of
> kobjects. sysfs_dirent->s_parent is added and each sysfs_dirent
> holds reference to its parent. Currently walking up the tree
> requires read locking and unlocking sysfs_dir at each level. This
> can be removed if name is added to sysfs_dirent.
>
> * As kobject can be disconnected anytime and sysfs code still needs to
> look follow dentry link in kobject, kobject->dentry is protected by
> dcache_lock. Once kobject becomes opaque to sysfs, this hack can go
> away. All in all, making kobject completely opaque in sysfs isn't
> too far away after this patch although it would require mass code
> update.
What would need to be updated after this?
> What do you think about this approach? If it's acceptable, I'll test
> further and split the patch into logical steps to get it reviewed
> better.
At first glance, I think it looks fine, but Maneesh is the one who
understands this code better than anyone, so I would like to get his
opinion on it.
I think you should start splitting it all up into steps, which will help
us review it a whole lot easier, as overall, I think this is a very
worthy goal.
thanks so much for doing this work,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists