lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704021126280.3808@jikos.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>, yanghong@...ss.com.cn,
	linux-usb-devel <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	hongzhiyi@...ss.com.cn, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] HID bus design overview.

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Li Yu wrote:

> Hi, I do not think that using blacklist in base driver for this purpose 
> is good idea. If so, we need modify source when each new HID device 
> driver come, that's so ugly. 

Hi Li,

well, the drivers are exceptions from the generic handling, so creating an 
exceptional rule (entry in hid_blacklist) for them is not that bad. OK, 
it's not the nicest thing on earth probably, but serves the purpose in 
current vendors-trying-to-break-hardware-in-the-most-original-way world 
quite well.

This is going to cause some headache to out-of-tree drivers. Oh well, do 
we care that much? 

In your scenario you'll still need a way how to unbind the device from the 
hid driver and bind it to the new specific device, won't you?. This could 
be done by a separate userspace program, but well ... I think just 
blacklisting the hardware is much cleaner, than needing to ship a separate 
userspace program along with the driver.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ