[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4610D937.20002@nagafix.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:21:43 +0100
From: Antoine Martin <antoine@...afix.co.uk>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
CC: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it>, devzero@....de,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel
release ?
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the
>> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation.
>
> Why? I've never understood what a framebuffer gives you that you
> don't have now.
Just like the network auto-configuration via dhcp, it would allow users
to download images+kernel and run them like appliances without
understanding anything about X or UML, just click and run.
We are all capable of setting up Xvfb here, but most users are not,
which is why they download ready-made images.
It would also make it a lot easier to focus on writing a management UI,
hell if there isn't one shortly after, I'll do one myself!
Think of a UML browser image (running IE via wine in a limited image
with just X + wine + IE - I would much prefer that to having wine+IE
installed locally), testing framebuffer apps like gtk-fb/cairo-fb
without risking your dev environment, etc...
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists