[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704021429420.3808@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:33:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Li Yu <liyu@...ss.com.cn>, yanghong@...ss.com.cn,
linux-usb-devel <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
hongzhiyi@...ss.com.cn, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] HID bus design overview.
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> I like this idea, but it might not solve the case where you have parts
> of the driver in kernel space and other parts in user space. For example
> the control of a LCD display on the keyboard. However in most cases
> registering drivers for a report id should be enough.
Hi Marcel,
the specialized driver could hook on all reports of the device (as
discussed a few mails ago in this thread) and have the possibility to do
three different things with the obtained report:
- pass it back to generic hid driver for "standard" processing
- process the report, and issue input_event() itself
- pass it to hidraw and let userspace to consume it
This is going to work for the scenario you have described, right?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists