[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46104954.50608@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 02:07:48 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mcdx -- do_request(): non-read command to cd!!
On 04/02/2007 02:02 AM, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 04/01/2007 12:06 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>> Looks like mcdx_xfer is sleeping while holding q->queue_lock. The
>> attached (untested) patch should fix it.
>
> This (including your followup) does indeed avoid the traces in the
> kernel log, but unfortunately, the driver seems to need a bit more.
>
> This may be expected, I'm not sure:
>
> root@...2:~# dd if=/dev/mcdx0 of=/dev/null bs=2048
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000221955 seconds, 0.0 kB/s
> root@...2:~#
>
> This I know isn't:
>
> root@...2:~# readcd dev=/dev/mcdx0 f=/dev/null
> Segmentation fault
> root@...2:~#
>
> (leaves a "note: readcd[1174] exited with preempt_count 1" in the log)
>
> and after a "mount -t iso9660 /dev/mcdx0 /mnt/cdrom", a:
>
> root@...2:~# tar cv /mnt/cdrom >/dev/null
>
> has upto now done all of:
>
> 1) segfault
> 2) make the kernel oops
> 3) reset the machine
>
> This thing is just so badly broken... ;-(
>
> I've attached the current patches from Jens and yourself (against
> 2.6.20.4) as a double check, but the driver's still totally unuseable
> even with them...
No, I didn't.
> I own two other legacy drives; a Panasonic CR562 (sbpcd.c) and a Sony
> CDU33A (cdu31a.c) which together with this Mitsumi LU005S (mcdx.c) make
> up also all but one of the controllers I have; a few standalone, but
> most on old ISA soundcards. When I last tested, cdu31a somewhat worked
> and sbpcd didn't. Had high hopes for mcdx.c upon seeing it compile
> without warnings, but alas.
>
> Last time Al Viro suggested ripping them out, I slightly objected:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/2/123
>
> but well, although I like playing with this stuff, I still don't know
> the first thing about the block layer and given the shape these things
> are in...
>
> Many thanks for looking though!
Rene.
View attachment "mcdx.diff" of type "text/plain" (1563 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists