linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070402142318.GA14256@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:23:20 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Joerg Schilling <schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de>, dougg@...que.net,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re:  [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls

On Mon, Apr 02 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this is a repost as I like to know the current state of the problem...
> > 
> > The USB DMA size problem is known to exist on Linux since February 2004.
> > I am still in hope that there will be a fix soon.
> 
> Me too.  I submitted the most recent version of the patch (labelled as857) 
> over a month ago and have received essentially no feedback on it.
> 
> Douglas, James...  What's the story?

FWIW, it had my ack, I think we were just waiting for Doug to ack the sg
bits.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/