lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:12:38 -0500
From:	"Steve French (smfltc)" <smfltc@...ibm.com>
To:	"Q (Igor Mammedov)" <qwerty0987654321@...l.ru>
CC:	linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: cifs and kthread_run / kernel_thread

Q (Igor Mammedov) wrote:

> Steve French (smfltc) wrote:
>
>> No - IIRC the original patch (for the switch of cifs from 
>> kernel_thread to kthread) had a
>> minor implementation problem in handling the cifs_demultiplex thread, 
>> so this one small
>> area was left with the old style.
>>
>>> iii) Is it difficult to switch to the new interface?
>>>  
>>>
>> No, I don't think so, but I have not investigated it.  We would be happy
>> to review and test a patch for this though.
>>
>>> ***************************
>>
>
> It seems to me that I rewrote cifs_demultiplex_thread to use 
> kthread_run in DFS patch.
>
Yes - Q's  patch has the final change to kthread (as part of a larger 
DFS change).  The original
patch which switched to kthread was done long before this.

I have not broken all the large dfs patch into small pieces but will 
look to see if just this part
can be done easily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists