[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4611239D.3070008@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:39:09 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mcdx -- do_request(): non-read command to cd!!
On 04/02/2007 09:10 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Updated patch attached :-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 0bc8b0b..cff761a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -324,3 +324,10 @@ Why: the i8xx_tco watchdog driver has been replaced by the iTCO_wdt
> Who: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
>
> ---------------------------
> +
> +What: The legacy CDROM drivers (drivers/cdrom/, except cdrom.c)
> +When: In 2.6.23
Not going to complain about it loudly. I like playing with these old
drives, but the drivers are so immensely broken that they don't seem to
serve a very useful purpose anymore; even if I, or someone else, would
ever get around to try and revive this hardware under Linux; the current
state of these drivers seems to imply we'd be better of starting from
scratch.
And even more so since I expect that any new attempts should do the "no
really, I'm a scsi drive" thing that most anything else is doing these
days. Using a different infrastructure like that would, I presume, mean
that really only the hardware details would remain useful from the old
drivers, and those will be present inside linux-2.6.22.tar.gz same as
before.
Having said that, it would still be good to have mcdx functional so
please don't let me keep you, Pekka, or anyone else from looking :-)
With a bit of luck sbpcd and cdu31a (and cm206 as the other controller
that I have) will be similarly broken and having an example in mcdx will
be useful whatever happens to the drivers in the upstream tree...
> +Why: They are all terminally broken (most don't even compile)
That's not true though... I just checked and they all compile on
2.6.20.4. sbpcd and cm206 with cli/sti warnings, the others without even.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists