linux-kernel - Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46116898.5050701@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:33:28 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mathiasen@...il.com
Subject: Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?

Roland Dreier wrote:
> 
>  > Obviously, anyone who adheres to the published interface can use one
>  > of these VID:DIDs -- as far as I'm concerned, even hardware vendors;
>  > we'll use the SID to distinguish between implementations.
> 
> I think for this to work, some attempt at a conformance testing
> program is required...
> 

How would you propose one goes about that?  It seems to me the only 
plausible thing is "does it work with the unmodified driver included in 
the Linux kernel?"  What else can one realistically do?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/