lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:33:01 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> CC: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mathiasen@...il.com Subject: Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices? Andi Kleen wrote: >> How would that work in the case where virtualized guests don't have a >> visible PCI bus, and the virtual environment doesn't pretend to emulate >> a PCI bus? > > If they emulated one with the appropiate device > then distribution driver auto probing would just work transparently for them. Yes, but, ideally with paravirtualization you should be able to avoid the overhead of emulating many major classes of device (storage, network, RNG, etc.) by developing a low-overhead passthrough interface that does not involve PCI at all. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists